//****************************************************************************// //****************** Exam 2 Review - December 2nd, 2019 *********************// //**************************************************************************// - Okay, it's the last class! - The final is taking place THIS FRIDAY, December 6th, in this room at 11:20am - The exam will be NON-CUMULATIVE, and'll be a similar format and length as the midterms (i.e.a mix of multiple-choice and short, 2-3 sentence answers) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - With that, let's start going over what'll be on the 2nd exam! - First up, stuff from ALBERT BORGMANN, including: - Borgmann was this philosopher of technology - DEVICE PARADIGMS were probably his most important idea - Machinery vs commodity - Paradigmatic Consumption (in that article we read) - Focal things / Practices - General philosophy of technology stuff, like technological determinism, utopianism, dystopianism, and instrumentalism - "This is honestly some of the hardest stuff we covered, in part because it was just so darn long ago" - We then talked about another tech philosopher, DON IHDE - He's a "phenomenologist" - what's that? - "Prognostic predicament" - Multistability (what is it? Why does he mention it?) - He also talked about 3 ways people approach technology, which we talked about in lecture: - Embodiment relationships - Hermeneutic relationships - Alterity relationships - Also mentioned: psychological impediments to ethical thinking for engineers! - The Problem of Many Hands - Blind spots (a few different types) - Normalizing deviance - Egoism / egocentrism - Microscopic vision - Uncritical deference to authority (Stanley Milgram) - Groupthink - "These really lend themselves to test questions; I mean, it's a bunch of technical terms!" - We talked about organizations and management stuff - How can engineers and managers come into conflict? What are their different loyalties/commitments? - What about WHISTLEBLOWING? - What does it mean, technically? - What are the 2 justifications for whistleblowing (i.e. harm-prevention and complicity-avoiding)? - We then moved on to the CHALLENGER DISASTER! - What happened here? What's the general story? - Don't forget there are 2 parts: the event itself, and then the investigation - Who/what was involved, particularly in the investigation into the disaster? - Who's Boisjoly? Was he a whistleblower? - What's Harry Collins' take? - What did Feynman do? - There was a chapter on HONESTY - Why is it wrong to tell lies from utilitarian, deontological, and virtue-based positions? - What kinds of dishonesty are there BESIDES just lie-telling? - Intellectual property - what kinds are there? - Dishonesty in research - what are its different forms? (e.g. plagiarism, ways of spoofing the data, etc.) - Conflicts of interest: what are these, how can they arise, and how can we avoid them? - This is one of the most practical, important ideas from this unit; "it's the standard-of-care of this half of the semester" - There was a chapter on EXPERTISE - What did we cover on the lecture here? - What's the tension between "expertise" and "democracy?" - What does the book say about being an expert witness? - What does Collins say about "interactional expertise"? - ...and another one on RISK - How does the textbook say engineering vs public ideas of risk differ? - What are the "utilitarian" and "capabilities" approach to risk? - What's required for "informed consent?" - Perrow's concept of "normal accidents" (as well as what the book says about them) - Schrader-Frechette's article about nuclear waste - Liability: how does this differ between "tort law" and "criminal law?" - Penultimately, there's the ENVIRONMENT - What's the U.S. government's goal for environmental law right now? - What kinds of attitudes can companies take toward regulation? - Anthropocentrism vs ecocentrism - What kinds of cleanliness accounts are there? - What's sustainability? - Who's Rachel Carson? - And, lastly, INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING - Absolutist vs relativist approaches - What're the book's 6 suggestions for tackling boundary-crossing problems? - What are "boundary-crossing" problems? - What KINDS of boundary-crossing problems does the book name? - "These are SUPER important and'll definitely appear, so look at them!" - Also, know the cases you read for recitation! They might make an appearance! - So, that's what we covered! Before you go... - The School of Public Policy offers a minor in Philosophy - consider taking that! - Also, please fill out the CIOS course evaluation! It helps me, and I thank you in advance! - "...I mean, I have tenure, so you're not going to get me fired, but I do read them and adjust my class, and my bosses read them to evaluate me as a teacher" - In particular, if you know a professor who isn't tenured yet, fill out the CIOS! Those actually matter for them getting tenured! - And with that, we'll end a bit early today - see you for the final!